Hemmer DeFrank Wessels PLLC is pleased to announce Kyle M. Winslow has been elected to partnership effective January 1, 2020.

A member of the firm’s litigation practice group, Kyle concentrates his practice on representing individuals and businesses in complex business disputes, business divorce, and plaintiffs’ defamation matters.

Outside of the firm, Kyle was appointed in 2018 by the Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to the Executive Branch Ethics Commission.  He recently completed a three-year term as a board member of the Northern Kentucky Bar Association.  Kyle is licensed in state and federal courts in Kentucky, and Ohio, and Indiana, and received his J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

 

If your company is classified as a “covered entity” (most healthcare providers are covered entities) or a “business associated” of a covered entity, you are surely aware of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA requires protection and confidential handling of individuals’ protected health information (or “PHI”). Healthcare organizations and businesses that provided services to healthcare organizations that create, use, or disclose PHI are required to safeguard it and to follow the various HIPAA rules – such as the privacy rule, the security rule, and the breach notification Rules.

A HIPAA violation could leave an individual’s sensitive, personal health information (PHI) exposed to others without causing the individual harm.  It could also result in an investigation by the government.  As part of its investigation, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights could impose hefty fines and other civil penalties.  Following a serious and intentional HIPAA violation, the Department of Justice may pursue criminal charges against the violator.

Given the serious consequences of a HIPAA violation, companies that handle health information and companies who provide services to those companies, should make sure that their handling of PHI is in compliance with the various HIPAA rules.

  • Install security — Computer files should be protected through passwords, encryption and other cybersecurity methods. Physical files containing PHI should be kept under lock and key, accessible only by designated, HIPAA-trained personnel.
  • Keep computer credentials individualized and confidential — A HIPAA violation may result from an unauthorized employee using another employee’s credentials to access PHI. Employees should have their own computer login information and accounts that provide access to the type of information pertinent to their job.
  • Communicate responsibly — An employee may violate HIPAA by discussing a person’s medical details in public or via text, email or phone. Communications should be sent through secure, approved channels.
  • Close or dispose of documents the right way — Tossing or leaving out a piece of paper that includes a person’s PHI or leaving a file up on a computer screen for everyone to see, can be considered HIPAA violations. Establish a method for disposing of confidential documents to make them unreadable, indecipherable and unable to be reconstructed, in accordance with HIPAA rules.

A HIPAA violation can be harmful to the violated individual as well as to the person or organization responsible for the violation. Our healthcare law attorneys work with covered entities to handle and help prevent violations of HIPAA. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

 

Shareholders have common law and statutory rights to inspect and copy the records and books of corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs). These rights exist so that shareholders are able to ascertain whether corporate management is being properly conducted and so that they have accurate information when voting on corporate issues.

These rights don’t often need to be exercised in public corporations, which are required by law to disclose their financial information regularly. But for privately held corporations, the right of inspection is a vital way for shareholders to keep tabs on management and finances.

Under Kentucky law, a shareholder may inspect and copy any of the following documents by providing the corporation with five business days’ written notice:

  • Articles of incorporation and all amendments to them
  • The company’s bylaws and all amendments to them
  • Resolutions adopted by the board of directors creating a class or series of shares
  • Minutes of all shareholders’ meetings for the last three years
  • Records of all action taken by shareholders without a meeting for the last three years
  • All written communications to shareholders within the last three years, including financial statements
  • A list of all the names and business addresses of the company’s current officers and directors
  • The company’s most recent annual report

Shareholders also have the right, upon five days’ notice, to inspect and copy accounting records and shareholder records, but only if all of these conditions are met:

  • The shareholder’s demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose.
  • The shareholder describes the purpose and the records sought with reasonable particularity.
  • The records requested are directly connected to the stated purpose.

If a corporation refuses to allow a requested inspection, the shareholder can file a lawsuit in the court of the county where the corporation’s principle office is located. If the court rules in favor of the shareholder, the corporation may be required to pay the shareholder’s costs and attorney’s fees.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

 

Dividing property is one of the most important and potentially contentious aspects of business partners falling out and going their separate ways. A business divorce requires that the company be fairly valued so that all or part of it can be sold, whether to insiders or to outside buyers.

A business valuation analyzes all areas of the company to determine the worth of its various departments and of the entity as a whole. Professional evaluators look at such as elements as the company’s capital structure, its management, the market value of its assets and its future earnings potential.

There are numerous ways to value a company during business divorces. Some of the most common methods are:

  • Market capitalization — The value of a public company typically is calculated by multiplying the company’s share price by the number of shares outstanding. If the price is $50 and there are one million shares outstanding, the company’s value is $50 million.
  • Times revenue — A multiplier is applied to the revenue the company has generated over a certain time period. The multiplier varies by industry. A tech company might be valued at 5x revenue while a service company might be valued at 1x revenue.
  • Earnings multiplier —The company’s price-to-earnings ratio is adjusted to account for current interest rates. This is often more accurate than the times revenue method because the earnings multiplier is based on profits.
  • Discounted cash flow — This is similar to the earnings multiplier method, except that the company’s cash flow is calculated taking inflation and other market risks into account.
  • Book value — This is the company’s total assets minus its total liabilities as shown on its balance sheet.
  • Discretionary earnings — This method, often used for valuing small businesses, takes gross earnings and adjusts them for depreciation, interest expense and non-operating and non-recurring income.

When business owners are engaged in a split up, it is to be expected that the choice of valuation method will be a point of contention. Different owners will likely choose their own evaluators, with each employing a different method. If the owners can’t agree on a selling price, some form of alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, may be used to arrive at a settlement.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

Purchasing a business triggers the duty to comply with the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a federal law mandating the disclosure of beneficial owners of certain U.S. entities to prevent illicit activities such as money laundering and fraud. Understanding the intricacies of the CTA and ensuring adherence is vital, not only to facilitate a smooth transaction but also to avoid significant legal repercussions.

The CTA requires entities such as corporations and limited liability companies to report detailed information about their beneficial owners, namely, those who own 25 percent or more of the entity or have significant control over it. Beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) must be filed with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). It includes the owners’ full legal names, birthdates, addresses and unique identifying numbers. BOI must be updated within 30 days of any change in ownership.

Non-compliance with the CTA can lead to severe penalties. If a business fails to provide accurate or updated information about its beneficial owners, it can face fines of up to $500 per day until the violation is corrected, reaching potentially substantial sums. Moreover, willful failure to report the required information or deliberately providing false or fraudulent information can result in criminal penalties. These include fines of up to $10,000 and/or imprisonment for up to two years. 

Importantly, these penalties can apply to violations that occurred before the acquisition. To mitigate those risks, prospective buyers should take several precautionary steps:

  • Due diligence — Conduct a review of the target company’s compliance history with the CTA. This includes verifying that all necessary filings are up to date and accurate. Engage with legal professionals who can scrutinize the documentation and history of compliance is advisable.
  • Integration plan — Develop a plan to integrate CTA compliance into the ongoing operations of the business post-acquisition. This should include procedures for regularly updating beneficial ownership information and monitoring compliance.
  • Training and awareness — Implement training programs for key personnel in the acquired company to ensure they understand the importance of CTA compliance and the procedures for maintaining it.
  • Establish compliance protocols — Set up internal controls and compliance protocols to regularly review and verify beneficial ownership information. This proactive approach can help in identifying and rectifying any potential discrepancies before they result in violations.

Consulting with a business law firm can provide you with assurance that all aspects of CTA compliance are addressed and can help you protect yourself from liabilities associated with any pre-existing violations.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

 

A business divorce can be a long, painful process. Breaking off from fellow shareholders or partners could have significant legal, financial and emotional consequences. There might be moments where you consider walking away without finalizing an agreement to protect your interests. However, the failure to tie up loose ends with the assistance of an experienced attorney could come back to haunt you even after everyone has gone their separate ways.

The U.S. Supreme Court in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley was faced with a case involving a husband-and-wife partnership. David and Kate Bartenwerfer formed a legal entity to purchase, renovate and sell a house in San Francisco. From the outset, David handled the project, including the hiring of contractors, while Kate remained on the sidelines. Eventually, the Bartenwerfer partnership sold the home to Kieran Buckley.

Once Buckley purchased the residence, he found numerous significant defects that had not been disclosed to him. Subsequently, he won a verdict exceeding $200,000 in a lawsuit against the Bartenwerfers. This result, along with other debts, led the couple to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Buckley sued, alleging that the debt to him should not be discharged, Section 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code bars the discharge of “any debt… for money… to the extent obtained by… false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud.”

Kate Bartenwerfer argued that because she lacked knowledge of her partner’s misrepresentations, she should be not responsible for the debt to Buckley. However, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Supreme Court held that a debtor cannot discharge a debt arising from a partner’s fraud—even if the debtor personally lacked knowledge or culpability.

Given this precedent, partners in the midst of a business divorce need to be aware of the possibility that they could face liability for acts that that they did not know about. You and your attorney might want to investigate your partner’s conduct and allocate responsibility in case a subsequent claim does arise.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

So, you’ve bought the building. You have the vision. It is all becoming a reality.

Maybe it’s an old barn you want to turn into a wedding venue. Maybe it’s an abandoned industrial building you plan to convert into high end apartments. Maybe it’s a warehouse you envision as a gym, or a brewery, or a creative space. You see endless potential where other people see problems, and you are ready to bring new life to a property that’s been sitting idle.

The purchase is complete. The keys are in your hand.

Now what?

This is the point where many (if not most) redevelopment projects begin to stall. This stall is not because the idea is bad, but because the process that follows is far more complex than most people expect.

It Starts with Your Idea

Your vision for what your project could be is only the beginning. Redeveloping or revitalizing a building involves layers and layers of legal and regulatory requirements that happen behind the scenes, and the average person does not see. Zoning rules, permits, inspections, and occupancy approvals are not simple technicalities, they are what determine whether your project can legally move forward at all.

One of the biggest challenges is that these rules are not uniform. Every city, town, and municipality has its own zoning code, permitting process, and inspection requirements. What worked in one location (or what a prior owner may have done or told you worked for them) does not guarantee that your project will be approved.

Zoning Matters Most

Zoning should always be your first step. Zoning determines what uses are allowed in a given area. Commercial, residential, industrial, mixed-use. These are the general classifications that dictate whether your idea is ever permitted on paper. But zoning is not just about the neighborhood. It is also about the building itself.

A property may be in a mixed-use or commercial district, yet the building may only be approved for a specific use. Changing a building from storage units to an event space, from industrial use to gym, or from commercial to HUD apartments often requires formal approval. That process may involve variances, conditional use permits, or hearings before a zoning board. In many cases, that approval comes through a Board of Zoning Appeals, which is often called a BZA.

A BZA process typically involves a formal application, public notice and a hearing where the proposed use is reviewed by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Neighbors in the community may have the opportunity to comments, however, the board is the one that ultimately gets to decide it the variance or the conditional use will be granted. This process can be long and daunting and can affect the timeline of your project, the budget of your project, and even the feasibility of your project. It needs to be considered early, before construction begins.

Skipping a review of zoning or assuming that zoning approval exists can lead to significant delays and expensive corrections later on, particularly if a project moves forward with necessary zoning authorization.

Don’t Overlook Historic District Restrictions

Another issue that often surprises owners is historic zoning.

If a building is located in a historic district or subject to historic preservation rules, additional layers of approval may apply. Changes to the exterior of the building, the windows, doors, signage, building materials, and even paint colors can be regulated. In some cases, interior alterations may also be restricted.

Historic designation does not mean redevelopment is impossible, but it does mean the process requires careful planning and early coordination sometimes even requiring coordination with the historic conservation board of the city or community you are redeveloping in. Discovering these restrictions after plans are finalized (or after work has begun) can significantly increase costs and timelines.

You Need Permits for More Than You Think

Once zoning is confirmed and any required approvals are obtained, the next step is permitting. Permits are often where redevelopment projects quietly fall apart.

Many property owners assume permits are only required for major construction or structural changes; however, permits are required for far more than most people expect. Generally, permits are required for all new construction, major repairs, alterations to a building, additions to a building, major plumbing or electrical changes, HVAC systems, fire alarms, fire suppression systems, and structural modification. The permit process is put in place to allow inspectors to verify that work meets safety and building code standards.

Permitting also matters because it ties directly into a building’s approved use. When a building is being converted from one use to another permits help document that transition and ensure that building systems meet the standards require for the new system. When a building changes from commercial use to residential use the fire, electrical and safety requirements generally change.

Failure to obtain proper permits can lead to enforcement actions, fines, and delays. Importantly, it can prevent your building from receiving a Certificate of Occupancy. Without that certificate, your building cannot legally be occupied, even if the work is complete.

Permits are critical when cities conduct inspections or respond to complaints made about your building. If an inspector identifies work that was done without a permit it generally will make the issue much bigger than it could have been. What might have started as a limited inspection can turn into a comprehensive review of the building, increasing both your cost and risk.

Doing work without permits often feels faster at the outset, but it frequently creates larger problems down the road. Unpermitted work can delay inspections, trigger enforcement actions, or prevent a building from being legally occupied.

Inspections and Compliance

After permitted work is completed, inspections follow. Building, housing, and fire inspectors are responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable codes, safety standards and approved plans. Their role is not to manage a project, but to confirm that the building is safe and compliant.

When inspectors identify violations or noncompliant conditions, they typically expect the property owners or property managers to evaluate the building as a whole and correct similar issues wherever they exist. An inspector notes problems in one location, but that is often an indicator of a broader compliance concern, not a single, contained defect.

Treating inspections as a checklist of individual fixes can lead to repeated citations, additional inspections, and increased enforcement. Taking a comprehensive approach by understanding the code requirements and applying the consistently throughout the building, helps projects move forward more efficiently and reduces the risk of ongoing compliance issues.

The Certificate of Occupancy

All  of these steps lead to one essential requirement: the Certificate of Occupancy. A Certificate of Occupancy is the City’s confirmation that a building is legally approved for its intended use and safe for people to occupy. Even if the renovations are complete, the building looks exactly like it is supposed to, and everything it perfect, the building cannot be lived in, operated out of or opened to the public without a Certificate of Occupancy.

To obtain a Certificate of Occupancy, the City will typically require that zoning is correct for the intended use, all required permits have been properly obtained, and all necessary inspections have been passed. If any of those steps were skipped or handled out of order, the Certificate of Occupancy can be delayed or denied. If any of those steps were skipped or completed out of order, securing a Certificate of Occupancy becomes significantly more difficult.

Common Mistakes We See

We regularly see property owners run into trouble because they assume that if a building can be used a certain way, it must be allowed to be used that way. Relying on what similar buildings nearby are doing or what a prior owner did is a common, and costly, mistake.

Another frequent issue is failing to distinguish between the zoning of the area and the approved use of the building itself. Even in mixed-use districts, a building may not be approved for residential or event use without additional approval.

Unpermitted construction is another major problem. Electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and fire systems are often modified without permits, creating issues when inspections occur.

Historic district restrictions are also frequently overlooked, particularly when owners are eager to move quickly. Discovering those requirements late in the process can derail an otherwise well-planned project.

Perhaps the most challenging situations arise when tenants or businesses are already occupying a building before zoning, permitting, and occupancy approvals are in place. At that point, the process has to be done in reverse, often under the pressure of inspections or enforcement action.

Working Backwards Is Always Harder

Our firm regularly helps clients navigate zoning, permitting, inspections, and Certificates of Occupancy. We can assist in coordinating with local authorities, identifying compliance issues, and helping projects move forward.

However, it is important to be candid: it is far easier, and far less expensive, to do this correctly from the beginning. When zoning and approvals are addressed early, projects tend to move more efficiently and with far less risk. When issues must be fixed after the fact, especially when a building is already occupied, the process becomes more complicated, more time-consuming, and significantly more expensive.

Redeveloping a building can be an exciting and rewarding investment. However, it can also be a legal and regulatory disaster if the proper steps are skipped or misunderstood.

Before you renovate, lease, or open your doors, make sure you understand what approvals are required, what restrictions apply, and what order the process should follow. Doing it right from the start is almost always the most efficient path forward, and it can save you time, money, and stress in the long run.

 

We issued this press release today on this important development for Finney Law Firm: 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Christopher P. Finney, Esq.

513-943-6655

Chris@FinneyLawFirm.com

Finney Law Firm, LLC and Hemmer Wessels McMurtry PLLC announce combination under the Finney Law Firm banner

 ~ Combined firm creates strong Cincinnati-area commercial law firm on both sides of the Ohio River ~

[Cincinnati, Ohio, December 2025] – The law firms of Hemmer Wessels McMurtry PLLC (HWM) and Finney Law Firm, LLC (FLF) have agreed to combine, with an effective date of January 1, 2026.

The new firm will retain the name Finney Law Firm, LLC and will expand on the success of both firms with a more powerful Cincinnati-area presence: 21 attorneys focusing on commercial transactions and litigation, with particular strengths in Real Estate, Employment Law, Defamation Law, and Constitutional Litigation.

The announcement follows agreement by both firms to meld their mature and accomplished practices with a now-broader geographic footprint. The firm is uniquely positioned to serve corporate and individual clients from innovative startups to established and successful businesses of all sizes.

Christopher Finney will serve as President of the firm, while Carlo Wessels and Todd McMurtry of HWM and Stephen Imm, Bradley Gibson, and Isaac Heintz of FLF will be named partners. The firm will also welcome Donald Hemmer as an Of Counsel Attorney and Scott Thomas as Senior Counsel.

“This combination is a momentous step for both firms, bringing together top-notch commercial and real estate transactional attorneys, with nationally recognized litigators in Employment Law, Defamation Law and Constitutional Law,” said Christopher Finney.  “HWM’s attorneys share our commitment to ‘making a difference’ for our clients and our communities, with a focus on delivering creative legal services with determination.  This, combined with our respectful culture, where each employee is empowered to reach their professional potential and personal goals, exemplifies the focus of our firm.”

Carlo Wessels added, “The combination of the two firms advances the historic mission of the members of Hemmer Wessels and McMurtry to deliver quality, reliable and breakthrough legal services for our clients on both sides of the river.  With the newly expanded firm, clients will gain access to a broader array of many of Cincinnati’s best attorneys bringing to the table enthusiasm for the law, each with deep experience and accomplishment.”

The combination will take effect on January 1, 2026, with client services and legal operations integrated immediately. A broader brand integration, including visual branding, website updates, and expanded public communications, will roll out in phases with a formal rebrand and full public launch planned for March 2026.

The combined firm will keep each of its three offices: Eastgate, Downtown Cincinnati, and Ft. Mitchell.

About Hemmer Wessels and McMurtry PLLC
Headquartered in Ft. Mitchell, KY, with a strong presence on both sides of the Ohio River, HWM has historically maintained a formidable transactional practice anchored by Donald Hemmer and Carlo Wessels.  Todd McMurtry has complemented that corporate practice with his superior litigation team that has become, among other accomplishments, nationally preeminent in Defamation Law.  Todd McMurtry also currently serves as president of the Kentucky Bar Association.  HWM will onboard eight attorneys to the combined firm.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

Social media platforms and podcasts give individuals the chance to reach a broad audience without having to go through a traditional media outlet. This can be empowering for someone who cannot convince a newspaper, broadcast station or book publisher that their message is worthwhile. On the other hand, without a structure in place to filter out potentially defamatory content, speakers risk serious legal problems if they make a false statement about someone else.

Even municipal officials can face libel suits. The mayor of a small Laurel County town is now the defendant in two separate legal actions stemming from comments he made on a podcast. According to two former Kentucky state troopers, London Mayor Randall Weddle made false and damaging statements about them. Elijah Jarvis has also sued Weddle based on material from a True CrimeCast episode. 

Brothers James and John Phelps say that Weddle accused them of sexual misconduct and other serious crimes, including murder. Their legal action alleges that these false statements have harmed their career prospects and reputations within their community. 

Defamation claims in Kentucky generally require a plaintiff to demonstrate the following four things:

  • False, defamatory statement — Should the case go to court, the trier of fact will evaluate the truth of Weddle’s comments. In some cases, defamation plaintiffs must show how the statements at issue harmed them. However, baseless accusations of criminal activity and sexual misconduct are known as defamation per se, meaning that we can assume that they would damage plaintiffs’ reputations.
  • Publication to a third party — Speaking a damaging falsehood to a third party is slander, while wider publication, such as through a podcast, constitutes libel. According to news reports, the True CrimeCast has more than 1,000 YouTube subscribers. 
  • Fault, amounting to at least negligence — In cases involving public figures, actual malice on the defendant’s part is required. This means that the speaker knew what they said was a lie or acted in reckless disregard of the truth. When the plaintiff is not a public figure, liability only requires negligence on the defendant’s part.
  • Damages — There are several ways to show damages stemming from defamation, including harm to career opportunities and symptoms of emotional distress. Even unproven allegations of criminal and sexual misconduct could change someone’s life measurably. 

Whether it’s on a podcast or anywhere else, false statements about you should not go unchecked. Hemmer Wessels McMurtry PLLC in Fort Mitchell handles libel and slander actions so that those who defame others are held to account. To speak with an experienced Kentucky lawyer, please call 859-344-1188 or contact us online

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit stg-devfinneylawfirmcom-stage.kinsta.cloud.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.com; 513.797.2850.

 

There is a great deal of discussion about the rights of employees with respect to their employers. Most of us are familiar with the laws that protect employees from things like discrimination, harassment, retaliation, not being paid overtime or minimum wage, unsafe working conditions, etc.

We hear a lot less about what employers have the right to expect from their employees. One important duty that employees do owe to their employers is what is called the “duty of loyalty,” or what in the old days was called the “faithless servant” doctrine.

This is not a duty that it is imposed by a statute passed by the legislature. It is rather what we call a “common law” duty. It is not necessary for the employer to state this in a contract or otherwise. It is an implied duty that exists in all employment relationships in the state of Ohio. If you are an employee, you owe this duty of loyalty to your employer.

What this means as a practical matter is that and employer may have a right to sue a former employee if the employee does something, during the course of his or her employment, that is directly contrary to the employer’s best interests, or that deliberately causes harm to the employer.

The duty of loyalty ends when the employment ends. The employee no longer owes such a duty after resigning or being terminated. But while the employment lasts, the employee must act honestly and in good faith in matters that directly affect the employer’s interests.

Examples of violating the duty of loyalty include competing with the employer while still employed with it, trying to solicit the employer’s customers before resigning, diverting business opportunities from the employer to a third party, misusing the employer’s property or money, or taking kickbacks or bribes from the employer’s customers.

So the duties between employers and employees do run both ways. Both sides of the employment relationship should keep that in mind.